An authentic meeting with the Other requires discarding the Everyone Else
Ruining the joke of Orcbrands legendary paradox of racist tolerance
You have heard this expression “An authentic meeting with the other”, often in relation to discussions of clashes of civilisation, multiculturalism, and the challenges and social questions of our age. It conjures an image of a man meeting someone from a different culture, and seeing the “shared humanity” underneath their individual “cultural” affections, that are supposed to be seen/revealed as arbitrary and an obstactle to our true fundamental shared humanist human experience. Can’t we just all get along? Yes, but only if you have an Authentic Meeting With the Other, and discard your primitive superstitions.
Orcbrand’s famous tweet, describing the multicultural international coalition of nationalists, racists, and other undesirables, somehow all getting along online, and forming a shared understanding or ad-hoc team, seemingly in total contradiction with their own principles, is a good jumping off point to explain a concept I like to call the “Everone Else”. I say that the simple reason for this strange apparent contradiction, is that the people in question are not defined by their political or racist convictions, but by their intuitive or formally expressed grasping of the Everyone Else.
I name it the Everyone Else, from the following illustration:
"Of course I know what I mean by X, and everyone I know understand what I mean, and I know You understand what l mean, and I know everyone you know understand - everyone understands! But everyone else...”
The Everyone Else is by definition an abstraction. It starts where any connection to real people stops. It’s every human being beyond Dunbar’s number, represented in the human mind. It’s not quite the Big Other of Lacanian fame, because it is not “the collective symbolic order”. It is in fact entirely disordered.
The Everyone Else is experienced as a wild beast, a force of nature, blind and cruel and indifferent, something you can only run from, and never confront. It is a Tyranny of the Everyone Else, which you are totally powerless to confront directly, but can only sneak around, trick, or exploit. It’s a wild mob or warband in bloodlust, which cannot be reasoned or bargained with, but is hellbent on trampling everything in it’s path.
It is also non-existent, and exclusively a kind of delusion, a product of the human mind, that does not actually relate to anything in the real world. It is a kind of waste-product of the mind, a malformed category, that is the product of the limitations of the human mind, which, due to the infinite hall of mirrors of representation we have created with information technology, has grown into a metaphoric conceptual tumor, in the mind of the vast majority of currently living human beings.
The difference between a “twitter racist” and everyone else :^), is that the twitter racist recognizes either intuitively or cognitively, this construct, and rejects it as the nonsense it is. This is also what enables them to be authentic, have genuine communication, and create friendships. You can never let your guard down around other people, and exchange vulnerability, if you are constantly worrying about Everyone Else suddenly jumping out of nowhere to get you, catch you with your pants down.
The Everyone Else is, worrying about “how it sounds”, instead of saying what you mean. It is a deep fundamental distrust, and a prey-mentality.
Regime apparatchiks live entirely within the Everyone Else, always worrying about “how it sounds”, living in a total deranged solipsism. Their much discussed strange language games and language policing and so forth, are all products of this particular derangement. “Everyone else” is going to get me, if I provoke them.
“Of course everyone I know knows I’m not a racist, but….”
We have all experienced people talking to “someone they made up in their head”, at you, or talking to themselves, but at you. They are talking to the Everyone Else, and trying to avoid being trampled by it. I think it is useful to say they are possessed by the E.E.
Like a wellful authentic meeting with the Other requires discarding of the E.E., so too does an unwitting authentic meeting exclude the E.E. Authentic Contact dispels the possession, and in coming into true contact with another Other, in the undeniable revelation of experience, they can be, at least momentarily, snapped out of it.
You can think about it as a kind of virtual laying on hands. Authentic contact dispels the possession - if you touch them, in the colloquial sense. Make them feel something, make them feel human, feel seen, feel touched. This can be done in a myriad of ways. I prefer making people laugh. This is also why I always say “everyone can see what you’re doing” when I partake in pointless internet fights. It’s an attempt to rouse them from the E.E.
Many are of course so far gone that they revolt at genuine touch, and do everything in their power to avoid being dragged out of their derangement. My much referenced friendship test requires wilful vulnerability, and when you are in the grips of the E.E., you feel that you are in constant danger, and any concession would be suicidal. Because Everyone (else) is Out To Get You. At a fundamental level, I dont believe it can be forced on someone. I don’t think you can free them against their will. It always has to be their choice, and for those deep in E.E. possession, the choice only ever gets harder every day. All you can do is offer them your hand. First hundred times, they might flinch thinking its a fist coming to strike them, and snarl and bite and snap, but we have tamed worse animals historically. It should be doable. Really the determining factor is how much work you’re willing to put in to each particular case.
On a lighter note, The Everyone Else is also what makes people bad writers. When you write for Everyone Else, you, by definition, write for no one.
Pedantry time: you actually are describing the Lacanian big Other. The "everyone else" is indeed the structuration of culture as perceived by the subject, however the subject of this piece disavows the Other, i.e. disavows castration, i.e. would be psychotic... if not for the fact that he DOES avow the Other, but in a negative form, placing him instead in the position of the (obsessional) neurotic.
"We strive to be unlike THEM."
"So you admit THEY have a way of being that you're living in (negative) accordance with?"
"Yes, but it's fake."
"So you're saying you're positioned yourself in opposition to something that doesn't exist?"
"No, by fake we mean immoral." (NB: the true psychotic would say "no, it really doesn't exist and we're not in opposition to it. Anyway I'm going to go take what's mine" *violently robs someone*.)
"So, you're condemning it? That's fine, insofar as it presupposes a recognition that it exists and is binding for others who you refuse to recognize as fellow men."
etc
I Got An Authentic Meeting with the Other and all I met was some guy:
There was a guy in school who was trans/something-word at the time idk, not important. 90% of the time, normal guy. 5% of time talking about some weird sex thing he saw online with the guys that everyone else was disgusted by, 5% of the time picking meaningless fights with girls about nothing. He worked hard, went to college, sorta-kinda started a bunch of small communities around the something-word. Wasn't fighting people on pronouns or anything like that, but was probably honestly much weirder than a media-portrayed trans guy. Fizzled out when he wasn't able to convert that to $$/clout, but made the news, embarrassed the group and destroyed it. In other words, he was an entrepreneur who mistimed the market.
I remember in school, trying to explain to him that it wasn't going to work. I didn't know he had visions of $$/clout but I remember telling him, listen, you're gonna run into problems if you keep weird-maxxing. Think about how much easier this would be if you stopped weird-maxxing.
Rn the news does like 500 op-eds about this guy, what we need to do to help him, and I think "I know this guy and you do not. He is not magical, he is not confused. He is just a guy who happens to be wrong about a few things and is trying to start a community to compensate." It's slightly weird how much time is spent reminding the world not to bash this guy, when no one really ever bashed him! What's weird is that, if you're friends with someone, you actually try to help them if you see them struggling, and Everyone Else tells you "No, that makes you a bad friend actually." The purpose of this, of course, is so that people only feel safe if advice comes wrapped in a package of "and no one can take this the wrong way because we will add This Needs Context and unperson your family if you correct our grammar", a bizzaro-world message that resonates with weird-maxxing folks even stranger than my friend.
Real friends help each other. If you're reading this, I hope you're life-maxxing bro.