War has Changed
Recent changes in the recruitment approach from military institutions and “intelligence agencies” have caused much clickbait. Case in point, starting out writing this, and wanting to find the CIA recruitment add I wanted to reference in the intro as an excuse to talk about what I want to talk about, I searched a search engine for the terms “woke cia ad”.
This is furthermore a nice little example of “they don’t want to win they just want you to play their game” - they want you to use the word “woke”. It doesnt matter if you “hate it”. as long as you use it, as if it was a real word referencing a real thing, let your enemies define your terminology, which in a culture war sense, is letting your enemy decide terms of engagement. which is losing.
The Cia thing is one in a string of signalling incidents. National militaries all over the world, make stupid advertisement campaigns about how the military is gay now. There is no shortage of interpretation of this phenomena as being a dastardly move by the radical musli-Marxist conspiracy to take away free speech and such. The Social justice Warriors and Buffy the vampire slayer fans, using their tremendous powers to pursue a political totalitarian agenda. That kind of thing. Just another blip of data in the content machine, completely interchangeable with any other. “The left” makes ridiculous propaganda, the CIA controlled content sorting algorithm tells you to react to it, you react to it like the good little controlled opposition you are.
What I propose is a radical reinterpretation of this phenomena.
What if it’s not some secret underhanded ten-point plan of hidden agendas and secret motives - what if it’s exactly what it says on the bottle. What if it’s exactly as advertised: who would fall for these ridiculous, patronizing, vapid posturing about being a gay loser?
Think really hard. Who does these ads work on.
Who falls for these things normally.
Who reacts to these things by saying “aaaaaaw so cute”
That’s right -
It’s dumb sluts.
The Future of Academia
Women today make up the vast majority of university students. Universities today function as educational only as a secondary effect, to it’s primary userbase. And I’d wager to it’s secondary too. I only went to university for the pussy. There are many names and much theorising that has already been done on these matters by intelligent and insightful writers such as myself; the cock carousel, etc. much study has been done on the pussy economy, which we will here only reference and not represent.
As it currently stands, the existence of the internet and the availability of pdf files have made everything about traditional academia completely worthless. The institution as an intellectual force - as a school, is long dead. what remains in place is an economical entity which sustains itself through abuse and exploitation of it’s “costumers”, it’s students. You could literally get anything you pay for in academia, for free, and the credentialism of peer review and guaranteed standards has already also been made superfluous.
The theoretical value of a degree is that “other people who are smart/cool”(professors), vouch for you being smart and cool, and you can tell your future employer that someone is vouching for you. This today, thanks to the internet and it’s impact on the rest of society, means nothing, as no one trusts the people or institution providing the guarantee, that you are smart/cool. For a myriad of reasons, some technological, some racist, some sexist. if anything getting a university degree is suspicious, a sign that you are maybe kind of stupid, because you fell for it.
What then, remains? Why do people continue to sign up for it?
For the pussy. The primary purpose of Universities is pussy distribution.
At the university I went to, for years they had a banner on their main website saying something like “90% of people who go to university find their future wife/husband here!”
Universal Basic Girlfriend, centrally controlled pussy distribution? This is not science fiction. This has been the case already for at least 20 years. Probably more.
Now what does this mean with regards to the first thing we were talking about, the weird military adds
If you can keep a completely pointless and useless system running, like the massively bloated scam industry of humanities academic publishing, for example, by having cornered the market on Pussy Distribution - imagine what else you could do.
There is tremendous economical power in controlling Pussy distribution. There is unparalleled manpower supply. Extreme political influence. All from just controlling this one single thing. You don’t even need a monopoly on it, just a major share.
Ask the question even shorter: Why would the military want, dumb sluts?
Why would the military, as an institution, be interested in becoming the new “collage” - the place aimless teens go to, because “that’s just sort of what you do”? Why would the extended military industrial complex be interested in this?
Imagine a world where going to boot camp has the same cultural implications as going to “band camp”. This is the world they want to create.
If you take the adds literally and think they want you to be gay, you’re an idiot. They want women. And idiots.
I know there's a temptation to keep all these things to ourselves, to restrict access to my great articles because it feels more intimate when it's "just us", and we can share a kind of hidden insight or understanding. But I implore you to share my articles with your mom and closest friends and strangers on various social media sites. because your mom might fall for my email scam and send me 5 bucks. thank you
Agree here. People think the military is all about shooting terrorists or civilians who might be terrorists. That's wrong. Most of it is paperwork and logistics. The only people doing much killing/being killed these days are drone pilots and black ops/special forces. That's how the US has been able to stay in Iraq/Afghanistan longer than they stayed in Vietnam with little to show for it. It's not a conspiracy, either, it's the system giving us what we want: spoils of war with minimal death and suffering (on our side, anyway).
Don't quote me on this, but women might even make for better drone operators (it's like Candy Crush but with fuzzier graphics). They're probably better at project management. And because it's no longer socially acceptable to have USO or Playboy entertain the troops, workplace romances are just going to have to be normalized.